NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 430 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 110 nm
- 7.8x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 109 Watt
- Around 52% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2058 vs 855
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2058 vs 855
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 June 2009 vs 28 July 2005 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 430 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 110 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 109 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2058 vs 855 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2058 vs 855 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500
- Around 29% higher texture fill rate: 10.32 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s
- Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 227 vs 122
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 120 vs 74
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 10.32 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 227 vs 122 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 120 vs 74 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 122 | 227 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 74 | 120 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2058 | 855 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2058 | 855 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Curie |
| Code name | G96C | G70 |
| Launch date | 15 June 2009 | 28 July 2005 |
| Place in performance rating | 1494 | 1495 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
| Price now | $249 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.08 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 430 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 80 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 110 nm |
| Pipelines | 32 | |
| Texture fill rate | 8 GTexel / s | 10.32 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | 109 Watt |
| Transistor count | 314 million | 302 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 33.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |

