NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs NVIDIA ION LE
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 and NVIDIA ION LE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 3x more core clock speed: 1340 MHz vs 450 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 5.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 501 vs 98
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 November 2009 vs 3 June 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1340 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 501 vs 98 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA ION LE
- 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 69 Watt
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 96 vs 46
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 69 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 96 vs 46 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
GPU 2: NVIDIA ION LE
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 | NVIDIA ION LE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 501 | 98 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 46 | 96 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9236 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1979 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1979 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1385 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1385 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 | NVIDIA ION LE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT215 | ION |
Launch date | 17 November 2009 | 3 June 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $80 | |
Place in performance rating | 1394 | 1397 |
Price now | $37.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 22.27 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1340 MHz | 450 MHz |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 257.28 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105C C | |
Pipelines | 96 | |
Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 69 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 727 million | 282 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | DVIVGAHDMI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCI |
Length | 6.6" (168mm) (16.8 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.2 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB or 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 54.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA |