NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1210 MHz vs 460 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 8.8 GTexel / s vs 3.68 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 48 vs 16
- 3.9x better floating-point performance: 116.16 gflops vs 29.44 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 65% lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 38 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1860 vs 858
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1860 vs 858
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 June 2009 vs 12 September 2007 |
Core clock speed | 1210 MHz vs 460 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 8.8 GTexel / s vs 3.68 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 48 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 116.16 gflops vs 29.44 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 38 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1860 vs 858 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1860 vs 858 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 233 vs 203
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 79 vs 51
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 233 vs 203 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 79 vs 51 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 203 | 233 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 51 | 79 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6433 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1860 | 858 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1860 | 858 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT216 | G84 |
Launch date | 15 June 2009 | 12 September 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1561 | 1563 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Price now | $89.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.66 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1210 MHz | 460 MHz |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Floating-point performance | 116.16 gflops | 29.44 gflops |
Gigaflops | 174 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 8.8 GTexel / s | 3.68 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 38 Watt |
Transistor count | 486 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Single Link DVIDisplayPortDual Link DVIHDMIVGA | 2x DVI |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Length | 198 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR2, GDDR3 | DDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 |