NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M vs ATI Radeon X1650
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M and ATI Radeon X1650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1210 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 4.4x more texture fill rate: 8.8 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 90 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1860 vs 1615
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1860 vs 1615
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 June 2009 vs 1 February 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 1210 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 8.8 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 90 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1860 vs 1615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1860 vs 1615 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1650
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M | ATI Radeon X1650 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 213 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 49 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6433 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1860 | 1615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1860 | 1615 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M | ATI Radeon X1650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | R500 |
| Code name | GT216 | RV530 |
| Launch date | 15 June 2009 | 1 February 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 1563 | 1565 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1210 MHz | 500 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 48 | |
| Floating-point performance | 116.16 gflops | |
| Gigaflops | 174 | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 90 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | |
| Texture fill rate | 8.8 GTexel / s | 2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 486 million | 157 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Single Link DVIDisplayPortDual Link DVIHDMIVGA | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.1 | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR2, GDDR3 | DDR2 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| HybridPower | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |