NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 10.8 GTexel / s vs 8.8 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 72 vs 48
- Around 34% better floating-point performance: 155.52 gflops vs 116.16 gflops
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 376 vs 213
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7386 vs 6433
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2120 vs 1860
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2120 vs 1860
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 January 2010 vs 15 June 2009 |
| Texture fill rate | 10.8 GTexel / s vs 8.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 72 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 155.52 gflops vs 116.16 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 376 vs 213 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7386 vs 6433 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2120 vs 1860 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2120 vs 1860 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1210 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 28 Watt
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 49 vs 29
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1210 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 28 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 49 vs 29 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 376 | 213 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 29 | 49 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7386 | 6433 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2120 | 1860 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2120 | 1860 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GT215 | GT216 |
| Launch date | 7 January 2010 | 15 June 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 1560 | 1563 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1080 MHz | 1210 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 72 | 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 155.52 gflops | 116.16 gflops |
| Gigaflops | 233 | 174 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 72 | 48 |
| Texture fill rate | 10.8 GTexel / s | 8.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt | 23 Watt |
| Transistor count | 727 million | 486 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Single Link DVIVGADisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVI | Single Link DVIDisplayPortDual Link DVIHDMIVGA |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR3 | DDR3, GDDR2, GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| HybridPower | ||
| MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
| SLI | ||
