NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 10.8 GTexel / s vs 8.8 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 72 vs 48
• Around 34% better floating-point performance: 155.52 gflops vs 116.16 gflops
• Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 382 vs 213
• Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7386 vs 6433
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2120 vs 1860
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2120 vs 1860

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M

• Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1210 MHz vs 1080 MHz
• Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 28 Watt
• Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 49 vs 32

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	382 213
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	32 49
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	7386 6433
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2120 1860
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2120 1860

Compare specifications (specs)