NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 11% better floating-point performance: 129.02 gflops vs 116.16 gflops
• Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 23 Watt
• Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 285 vs 213
• Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 74 vs 49
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2380 vs 1860
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2380 vs 1860

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M

• Around 80% higher core clock speed: 1210 MHz vs 672 MHz
• Around 49% higher texture fill rate: 8.8 GTexel / s vs 5.9 billion / sec
• 4.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6433 vs 1326

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	285 213
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	74 49
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1326 6433
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2380 1860
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2380 1860

Compare specifications (specs)