NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 66 vs 43
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 395 vs 379
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 February 2010 vs 3 March 2009 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 66 vs 43 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 395 vs 379 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 1375 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 76% higher texture fill rate: 31 billion / sec vs 17.6 GTexel / s
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 112 vs 96
- Around 20% better floating-point performance: 308 gflops vs 257.28 gflops
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3085 vs 2505
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3085 vs 2505
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1375 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 31 billion / sec vs 17.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 112 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 308 gflops vs 257.28 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3085 vs 2505 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3085 vs 2505 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 66 | 43 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 395 | 379 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2505 | 3085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2505 | 3085 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G92 | G92 |
Launch date | 2 February 2010 | 3 March 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1453 | 1456 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 1375 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 257.28 gflops | 308 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 112 |
Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s | 31 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 112 | |
Gigaflops | 462 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | DisplayPortSingle Link DVIDual Link DVIVGALVDSHDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 175 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 32.0 GB / s | 61 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PureVideo HD |