NVIDIA Quadro 1000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 1000M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 4% better floating-point performance: 268.8 gflops vs 257.28 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 560 vs 397
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 197 vs 63
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 January 2011 vs 2 February 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops vs 257.28 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 560 vs 397 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 197 vs 63 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM
- Around 57% higher texture fill rate: 17.6 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2505 vs 2327
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2505 vs 2327
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2505 vs 2327 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2505 vs 2327 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro 1000M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 560 | 397 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 197 | 63 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2131 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.218 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 207.789 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.52 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.149 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.677 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 894 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1633 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2327 | 2505 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 894 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1633 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2327 | 2505 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro 1000M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla |
| Code name | GF108 | G92 |
| Launch date | 13 January 2011 | 2 February 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $174.95 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1454 | 1455 |
| Price now | $99.95 | |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.91 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops | 257.28 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 96 |
| Texture fill rate | 11.2 GTexel / s | 17.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Length | 175 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 32.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |

