NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M

NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
2x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 500 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
6.3x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 75 Watt
2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 221 vs 87

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	3 September 2010 vs 2 February 2010
Core clock speed	1000 MHz vs 500 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	12 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	221 vs 87

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM

5.9x more texture fill rate: 17.6 GTexel / s vs 3.0 billion / sec
2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
2.7x better floating-point performance: 257.28 gflops vs 96 gflops
2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz
Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 398 vs 286
Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2505 vs 1570
Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2505 vs 1570

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	17.6 GTexel / s vs 3.0 billion / sec
Pipelines	96 vs 48
Floating-point performance	257.28 gflops vs 96 gflops
Memory clock speed	1600 MHz vs 800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	398 vs 286
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2505 vs 1570
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2505 vs 1570

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

286

398

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

221

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1570

2505

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1570

2505

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M	NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark	286	398
PassMark - G2D Mark	221	87
Geekbench - OpenCL	751
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	442
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	442
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1158
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1158
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1570	2505
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1570	2505

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M	NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi	Tesla
Code name	GF108	G92
Launch date	3 September 2010	2 February 2010
Place in performance rating	1382	1383
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Technical info
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	500 MHz
CUDA cores	48
Floating-point performance	96 gflops	257.28 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	65 nm
Pipelines	48	96
Texture fill rate	3.0 billion / sec	17.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	12 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	585 million	754 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Length		175 mm
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	512 MB
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB / s	32.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory type	(G)DDR3	GDDR3
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11	DirectX 11
Optimus