Intel HD Graphics 5000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 5000 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Intel HD Graphics 5000

NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5000

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 581 vs 286
Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 vs 221
4.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3167 vs 751
Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 713 vs 442
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1713 vs 1570
Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 713 vs 442
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1713 vs 1570

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2013 vs 3 September 2010
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm vs 40 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	581 vs 286
PassMark - G2D Mark	225 vs 221
Geekbench - OpenCL	3167 vs 751
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	713 vs 442
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1713 vs 1570
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	713 vs 442
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1713 vs 1570

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M

5x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 200 MHz
Around 20% higher pipelines: 48 vs 40
2.5x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 30 Watt
Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1158 vs 1103
Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1158 vs 1103

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1000 MHz vs 200 MHz
Pipelines	48 vs 40
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	12 Watt vs 30 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1158 vs 1103
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1158 vs 1103

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

581

286

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

225

221

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

3167

751

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

713

442

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1103

1158

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1713

1570

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

713

442

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1103

1158

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1713

1570

Name	Intel HD Graphics 5000	NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M
PassMark - G3D Mark	581	286
PassMark - G2D Mark	225	221
Geekbench - OpenCL	3167	751
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	9.563
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	490.588
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	713	442
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1103	1158
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1713	1570
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	713	442
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1103	1158
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1713	1570

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel HD Graphics 5000	NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 7.5	Fermi
Code name	Haswell GT3	GF108
Launch date	27 May 2013	3 September 2010
Place in performance rating	1381	1383
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz
Core clock speed	200 MHz	1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	40	48
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt	12 Watt
Transistor count	1,300 million	585 million
CUDA cores		48
Floating-point performance		96 gflops
Texture fill rate		3.0 billion / sec
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.3	4.6
Memory
Memory bus width	64 / 128 Bit	128 Bit
Shared memory	1	0
Maximum RAM amount		512 MB
Memory bandwidth		25.6 GB / s
Memory clock speed		800 MHz
Memory type		(G)DDR3
Technologies
Quick Sync
3D Blu-Ray
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11		DirectX 11
Optimus