NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 8.5x more texture fill rate: 25.5 GTexel / s vs 3.0 billion / sec
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- 6.4x better floating-point performance: 612.1 gflops vs 96 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1502 vs 442
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2167 vs 1158
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 vs 1570
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1502 vs 442
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2167 vs 1158
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 vs 1570
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 24 April 2012 vs 3 September 2010 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.5 GTexel / s vs 3.0 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 612.1 gflops vs 96 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1502 vs 442 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2167 vs 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 vs 1570 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1502 vs 442 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2167 vs 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 vs 1570 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 797 MHz
- 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 50 Watt
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 797 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.932 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 254.345 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.14 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.613 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.32 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1502 | 442 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2167 | 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 | 1570 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1502 | 442 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2167 | 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 | 1570 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 286 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 221 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 751 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | GK107 | GF108 |
| Launch date | 24 April 2012 | 3 September 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 1386 | 1388 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 797 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 612.1 gflops | 96 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.5 GTexel / s | 3.0 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 12 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 585 million |
| CUDA cores | 48 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | (G)DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5750
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 415M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM vs
ATIRadeon HD 5570
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM vs
AMDRadeon HD 7540D IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R7 M270
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM vs
IntelUHD Graphics 620
