NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1796 MHz vs 900 MHz (DDR3)
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.756 vs 2.597
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 637 vs 545
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 637 vs 545
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1148 vs 903
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1148 vs 903
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 April 2012 vs 13 April 2011 |
| Memory clock speed | 1796 MHz vs 900 MHz (DDR3) |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.756 vs 2.597 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 637 vs 545 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 637 vs 545 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1148 vs 903 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1148 vs 903 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
- 2x more core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 810 MHz
- Around 3% lower typical power consumption: 29 Watt vs 30 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB (DDR3) vs 512 MB
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1455 vs 1364
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1455 vs 1364
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 810 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 6.5 billion / sec vs 6.48 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 155.52 gflops vs 155.5 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt vs 30 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB (DDR3) vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1455 vs 1364 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1455 vs 1364 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.756 | 2.597 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 637 | 545 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 637 | 545 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1148 | 903 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1148 | 903 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1364 | 1455 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1364 | 1455 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | 0.239 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 310 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 135 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1271 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 76.214 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.862 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.574 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | GF119 | GF119 |
| Launch date | 2 April 2012 | 13 April 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1590 | 1591 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $59 | |
| Price now | $59.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.58 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 155.5 gflops | 155.52 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 48 |
| Texture fill rate | 6.48 GTexel / s | 6.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 29 Watt |
| Transistor count | 292 million | 292 million |
| CUDA cores | 48 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 102 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-IHDMIVGA (optional) |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB (DDR3) |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.37 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1796 MHz | 900 MHz (DDR3) |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 380 LP
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 OEM vs
IntelHD Graphics 3000
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 520
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 OEM vs
AMDRadeon HD 8180
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 720
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R2 Graphics
