NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 576 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 6.1x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 182 Watt
Launch date | 2 April 2012 vs 16 September 2008 |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 576 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 182 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
- 6.4x more texture fill rate: 41.5 GTexel / s vs 6.48 GTexel / s
- 4.5x more pipelines: 216 vs 48
- 3.5x better floating-point performance: 536.5 gflops vs 155.5 gflops
- Around 75% higher maximum memory size: 896 MB vs 512 MB
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 1998 MHz vs 1796 MHz
Texture fill rate | 41.5 GTexel / s vs 6.48 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 216 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 536.5 gflops vs 155.5 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 896 MB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1998 MHz vs 1796 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.756 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 637 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 637 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1148 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1148 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1364 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1364 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GF119 | GT200 |
Launch date | 2 April 2012 | 16 September 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1597 | not rated |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 576 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 155.5 gflops | 536.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 216 |
Texture fill rate | 6.48 GTexel / s | 41.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 182 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 1,400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 896 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.37 GB / s | 111.9 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 448 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1796 MHz | 1998 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |