NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• 3x more pipelines: 144 vs 48
• 2.2x better floating-point performance: 253.4 gflops vs 116.16 gflops
• Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1580 MHz
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 551 vs 231
• 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 171 vs 53
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2418 vs 1814
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2418 vs 1814

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

• 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6543 vs 2520

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	551 231
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	171 53
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2520 6543
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2418 1814
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2418 1814

Compare specifications (specs)