NVIDIA NVS 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 510 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 510

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 192 vs 144
• Around 21% better floating-point performance: 306.0 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 685 vs 551
• Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 286 vs 171
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.809 vs 5.332
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1211 vs 800
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1211 vs 800

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M

• Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz
• Around 48% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2520 vs 1699
• Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 205.545 vs 111.269
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.635 vs 0.399
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.932 vs 7.769
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.728 vs 9.522
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1833 vs 976
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2418 vs 1720
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1833 vs 976
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2418 vs 1720

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 510
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	685 551
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	286 171
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1699 2520
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.809 5.332
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	111.269 205.545
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.399 0.635
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.769 10.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.522 22.728
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1211 800
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	976 1833
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1720 2418
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1211 800
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	976 1833
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1720 2418

Compare specifications (specs)