NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 889 MHz vs 753 MHz
- 2.7x more pipelines: 384 vs 144
- Around 74% better floating-point performance: 441.6 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 653 vs 551
- Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3687 vs 2520
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.572 vs 5.332
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.808 vs 0.635
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.943 vs 10.932
- Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 39.301 vs 22.728
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1524 vs 800
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2519 vs 2418
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1524 vs 800
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2519 vs 2418
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 April 2013 vs 22 March 2012 |
| Boost clock speed | 889 MHz vs 753 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 144 |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops vs 253.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 653 vs 551 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3687 vs 2520 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.572 vs 5.332 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.808 vs 0.635 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.943 vs 10.932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 39.301 vs 22.728 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1524 vs 800 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2519 vs 2418 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1524 vs 800 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2519 vs 2418 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 171 vs 129
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 205.545 vs 151.304
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1833 vs 1426
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1833 vs 1426
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 vs 129 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 205.545 vs 151.304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1833 vs 1426 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1833 vs 1426 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 653 | 551 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 129 | 171 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3687 | 2520 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.572 | 5.332 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 151.304 | 205.545 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.808 | 0.635 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.943 | 10.932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 39.301 | 22.728 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1524 | 800 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1426 | 1833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2519 | 2418 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1524 | 800 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1426 | 1833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2519 | 2418 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | GK208 | GF116 |
| Launch date | 1 April 2013 | 22 March 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1449 | 1451 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 889 MHz | 753 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 575 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 253.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 144 |
| Texture fill rate | 9.2 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 35 Watt |
| CUDA cores | Up to 144 | |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
