NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M vs NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M and NVIDIA Quadro 1000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 144 vs 96
• Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2571 vs 2131
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.332 vs 5.218
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.635 vs 0.52
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.932 vs 10.149
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1833 vs 1633
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2418 vs 2327
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1833 vs 1633
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2418 vs 2327

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

• Around 6% better floating-point performance: 268.8 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 565 vs 555
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 195 vs 171
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 207.789 vs 205.545
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.677 vs 22.728
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 894 vs 800
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 894 vs 800

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	555 565
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	171 195
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2571 2131
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.332 5.218
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	205.545 207.789
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.635 0.52
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.932 10.149
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.728 23.677
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	800 894
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1833 1633
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2418 2327
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	800 894
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1833 1633
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2418 2327

Compare specifications (specs)