NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 384 vs 240
- Around 3% better floating-point performance: 692.7 gflops vs 673.9 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 219 Watt
- 2.3x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 896 MB
- Around 57% higher memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 1134 MHz
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 292 vs 78
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3328 vs 3195
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3328 vs 3195
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 June 2012 vs 15 January 2009 |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 240 |
| Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops vs 673.9 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 219 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 896 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz vs 1134 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 292 vs 78 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 vs 3195 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 vs 3195 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
- Around 56% higher core clock speed: 1404 MHz vs 902 MHz
- Around 75% higher texture fill rate: 50.6 billion / sec vs 28.86 GTexel / s
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1414 vs 1177
- 6.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23256 vs 3754
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1404 MHz vs 902 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 50.6 billion / sec vs 28.86 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1414 vs 1177 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23256 vs 3754 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1177 | 1414 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 292 | 78 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3754 | 23256 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.448 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.777 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.792 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.637 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.86 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2134 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2375 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 | 3195 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2134 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2375 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 | 3195 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1565 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GK107 | GT200B |
| Launch date | 5 June 2012 | 15 January 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | $249 |
| Place in performance rating | 1192 | 1194 |
| Price now | $59.99 | $119.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 25.25 | 13.43 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 902 MHz | 1404 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops | 673.9 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 240 |
| Texture fill rate | 28.86 GTexel / s | 50.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 219 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,400 million |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Two Dual Link DVI, 2x DVI |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 896 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB / s | 127.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 448 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 1134 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 285
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 275
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6490M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 vs
IntelIris Graphics 5100
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 vs
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M350
