NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 384 vs 240
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 204 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 43% higher memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 1242 MHz
- 4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 295 vs 73
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 June 2012 vs 23 December 2008 |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 240 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 204 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz vs 1242 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 295 vs 73 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
- Around 64% higher core clock speed: 1476 MHz vs 902 MHz
- Around 79% higher texture fill rate: 51.8 billion / sec vs 28.86 GTexel / s
- Around 2% better floating-point performance: 708.5 gflops vs 692.7 gflops
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1513 vs 1178
- 5.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22124 vs 3727
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3347 vs 3328
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 vs 3328
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1476 MHz vs 902 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 51.8 billion / sec vs 28.86 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 708.5 gflops vs 692.7 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1513 vs 1178 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22124 vs 3727 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 vs 3328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 vs 3328 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1178 | 1513 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 295 | 73 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3727 | 22124 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.448 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.777 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.792 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.637 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.86 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2134 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2375 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 | 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2134 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2375 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 | 3347 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1565 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GK107 | GT200B |
| Launch date | 5 June 2012 | 23 December 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | $359 |
| Place in performance rating | 1199 | 1200 |
| Price now | $59.99 | $179.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 25.25 | 9.17 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 902 MHz | 1476 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops | 708.5 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 240 |
| Texture fill rate | 28.86 GTexel / s | 51.8 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 204 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,400 million |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVTwo Dual Link DVI |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB / s | 159.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 1242 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3410
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 5800
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 285
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8670D
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 vs
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 vs
IntelHD Graphics P530
