AMD Radeon R6 M255DX vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R6 M255DX and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R6 M255DX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 576 vs 384
- 4.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17123 vs 3727
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3563 vs 3328
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3563 vs 3328
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 January 2014 vs 5 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 576 vs 384 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17123 vs 3727 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3563 vs 3328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3563 vs 3328 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 902 MHz vs 780 MHz
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2134 vs 1055
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2134 vs 1055
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2375 vs 1927
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2375 vs 1927
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 295 vs 116
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1178 vs 605
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 902 MHz vs 780 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2134 vs 1055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2134 vs 1055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2375 vs 1927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2375 vs 1927 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 295 vs 116 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1178 vs 605 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R6 M255DX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R6 M255DX | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17123 | 3727 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1055 | 2134 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1055 | 2134 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1927 | 2375 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1927 | 2375 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3563 | 3328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3563 | 3328 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 116 | 295 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 605 | 1178 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.448 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.777 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.792 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.637 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.86 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1565 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R6 M255DX | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Jet | GK107 |
| Launch date | 7 January 2014 | 5 June 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1197 | 1199 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | |
| Price now | $59.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 25.25 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 855 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 780 MHz | 902 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 576 | 384 |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,270 million |
| Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 28.86 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Enduro | ||
| Powerplay | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R6 M255DX with others
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX vs
ATIRadeon 9200 PRO
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX vs
ATIRadeon 9200
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 285
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX vs
AMDRadeon HD 8670D
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX vs
IntelHD Graphics P530
