NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 384 vs 336
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 3140 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1583 vs 296
- 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2289 vs 475
- 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3127 vs 657
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1583 vs 296
- 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2289 vs 475
- 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3127 vs 657
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 May 2012 vs 28 June 2011 |
Pipelines | 384 vs 336 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 3140 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1583 vs 296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2289 vs 475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3127 vs 657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1583 vs 296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2289 vs 475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3127 vs 657 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
- 2x better floating-point performance: 772.8 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 1 GB
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1864 vs 707
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 358 vs 172
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5696 vs 2344
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.911 vs 6.495
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 533.677 vs 251.012
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.681 vs 0.649
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.229 vs 13.333
- 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 66.187 vs 13.954
Specifications (specs) | |
Floating-point performance | 772.8 gflops vs 384.0 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1536 MB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1864 vs 707 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 358 vs 172 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5696 vs 2344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.911 vs 6.495 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 533.677 vs 251.012 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.681 vs 0.649 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.229 vs 13.333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 66.187 vs 13.954 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 707 | 1864 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 | 358 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2344 | 5696 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.495 | 14.911 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 251.012 | 533.677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.649 | 1.681 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.333 | 31.229 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.954 | 66.187 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1583 | 296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2289 | 475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3127 | 657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1583 | 296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2289 | 475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3127 | 657 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GF108 | GF114 |
Launch date | 4 May 2012 | 28 June 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $849.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 1345 | 1348 |
Price now | $849.99 | |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.17 | |
Technical info |
||
CUDA cores | Up to 384 | 336 |
Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops | 772.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 336 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1,950 million |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz | |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12 API |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bus width | 128bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3140 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3\DDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 72.0 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers | ||
3D Gaming | ||
SLI |