NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 14% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 336
- 3.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 20 Watt versus 75 Watt
- 2.1x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 3140 MHz versus 1500 MHz
- 5.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1583 versus 296
- 4.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2289 versus 475
- 4.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3127 versus 657
- 5.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1583 versus 296
- 4.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2289 versus 475
- 4.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3127 versus 657
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 4 May 2012 versus 28 June 2011 |
Pipelines | 384 versus 336 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt versus 75 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3140 MHz versus 1500 MHz |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1583 versus 296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2289 versus 475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3127 versus 657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1583 versus 296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2289 versus 475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3127 versus 657 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
- 2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 772.8 gflops versus 384.0 gflops
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 1536 MB versus 1 GB
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1864 versus 707
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 358 versus 172
- 2.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5696 versus 2344
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.911 versus 6.495
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 533.677 versus 251.012
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.681 versus 0.649
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.229 versus 13.333
- 4.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 66.187 versus 13.954
Caractéristiques | |
Performance á point flottant | 772.8 gflops versus 384.0 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 1536 MB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1864 versus 707 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 358 versus 172 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5696 versus 2344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.911 versus 6.495 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 533.677 versus 251.012 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.681 versus 0.649 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.229 versus 13.333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 66.187 versus 13.954 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 707 | 1864 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 | 358 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2344 | 5696 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.495 | 14.911 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 251.012 | 533.677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.649 | 1.681 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.333 | 31.229 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.954 | 66.187 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1583 | 296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2289 | 475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3127 | 657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1583 | 296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2289 | 475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3127 | 657 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | GF108 | GF114 |
Date de sortie | 4 May 2012 | 28 June 2011 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $849.99 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1345 | 1348 |
Prix maintenant | $849.99 | |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 1.17 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Noyaux CUDA | Up to 384 | 336 |
Performance á point flottant | 384.0 gflops | 772.8 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 336 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 75 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 1,950 million |
Vitesse du noyau | 575 MHz | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 32.2 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | large |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12 API |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128bit | 192 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3140 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3\DDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 72.0 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers | ||
3D Gaming | ||
SLI |