NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250 IGP

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250 IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
• 9.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 935 vs 98
• 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3670 vs 813
• 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3341 vs 699
• 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3670 vs 813
• 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3341 vs 699

Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250 IGP

• Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 280 vs 160

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250 IGP

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	935 98
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	160 280
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3670 813
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3341 699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3670 813
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3341 699

Compare specifications (specs)