NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M vs NVIDIA GeForce 7300 SE

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M and NVIDIA GeForce 7300 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• 16.2x more texture fill rate: 22.7 billion / sec vs 1.4 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
• 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
• 2.7x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 666 MHz
• 23.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 934 vs 39
• 29.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3341 vs 112
• 29.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3341 vs 112

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 7300 SE

• Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 251 vs 163

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 7300 SE

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	934 39
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	163 251
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3341 112
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3341 112

Compare specifications (specs)