NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M vs ATI Radeon HD 5750

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M and ATI Radeon HD 5750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 32 Watt vs 86 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2683 vs 971
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.493 vs 7.384
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.863 vs 0.679
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3670 vs 1757
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3670 vs 1757

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5750

• Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 22.7 billion / sec
• Around 88% higher pipelines: 720 vs 384
• Around 85% better floating-point performance: 1,008.0 gflops vs 544.5 gflops
• 2.6x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1166 vs 934
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 336 vs 161
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 460.31 vs 285.42
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.118 vs 17.242
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 53.346 vs 19.116
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2124 vs 1913
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2124 vs 1913

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5750

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	934 1166
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	161 336
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2683 971
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.493 7.384
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	285.42 460.31
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.863 0.679
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.242 23.118
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.116 53.346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1913 2124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3670 1757
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3341 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1913 2124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3670 1757
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3341 3347

Compare specifications (specs)