NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 vs ATI Radeon HD 3870
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and ATI Radeon HD 3870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 777 MHz
- Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 15.26 GTexel / s vs 12.43 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 5.6x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 106 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 623 vs 552
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 212 vs 57
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 March 2014 vs 19 November 2007 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 777 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 15.26 GTexel / s vs 12.43 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 106 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 vs 552 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 vs 57 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3870
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 320 vs 192
- Around 36% better floating-point performance: 497.3 gflops vs 366.3 gflops
- 2252x more memory clock speed: 2252 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3131 vs 1833
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3131 vs 1833
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 320 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 497.3 gflops vs 366.3 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 2252 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3131 vs 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3131 vs 1833 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 3870
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | ATI Radeon HD 3870 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 | 552 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 | 57 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1946 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 100.391 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 | 3131 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 | 3131 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | ATI Radeon HD 3870 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GK208B | RV670 |
Launch date | 27 March 2014 | 19 November 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $34.99 | $269 |
Place in performance rating | 1488 | 1398 |
Price now | $34.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 23.15 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 777 MHz |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Floating-point performance | 366.3 gflops | 497.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Pipelines | 192 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 15.26 GTexel / s | 12.43 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 106 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 666 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 241 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 72.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | 2252 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR4 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
PureVideo |