NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 vs AMD Radeon HD 7420G
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and AMD Radeon HD 7420G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 99% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 480 MHz
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 192 vs 128
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 623 vs 305
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 212 vs 104
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1946 vs 675
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1494 vs 881
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1494 vs 881
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 March 2014 vs 1 June 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 480 MHz |
| Pipelines | 192 vs 128 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 vs 305 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 vs 104 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1946 vs 675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 vs 881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 vs 881 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7420G
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2023 vs 1833
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2023 vs 1833
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2023 vs 1833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2023 vs 1833 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7420G
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | AMD Radeon HD 7420G |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 | 305 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 | 104 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1946 | 675 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 100.391 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 | 881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 | 2023 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 | 881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 | 2023 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | AMD Radeon HD 7420G | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Terascale 3 |
| Code name | GK208B | Trinity |
| Launch date | 27 March 2014 | 1 June 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $34.99 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1488 | 1490 |
| Price now | $34.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 23.15 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 480 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Floating-point performance | 366.3 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
| Pipelines | 192 | 128 |
| Texture fill rate | 15.26 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 292 million | |
| Boost clock speed | 655 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| PhysX | ||
| PureVideo | ||
