NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 vs AMD FirePro M2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and AMD FirePro M2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 91% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 500 MHz
• Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 15.26 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 74% lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 33 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 626 vs 425
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 212 vs 206
• Around 67% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1947 vs 1168
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.705 vs 3.284
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.441 vs 0.31
• Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 977 vs 544
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1833 vs 1709
• Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 977 vs 544
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1833 vs 1709

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M2000

• 2.5x more pipelines: 480 vs 192
• Around 31% better floating-point performance: 480.0 gflops vs 366.3 gflops
• 3200x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
• Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 195.801 vs 100.391
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.402 vs 8.146
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 44.254 vs 20.64

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M2000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	626 425
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	212 206
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1947 1168
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.705 3.284
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	100.391 195.801
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.441 0.31
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.146 10.402
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.64 44.254
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	977 544
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1494 1498
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1833 1709
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	977 544
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1494 1498
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1833 1709

Compare specifications (specs)