NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 66% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 66% higher texture fill rate: 15.26 GTexel / s vs 9.2 GTexel / s
- 6x more pipelines: 192 vs 32
- 5x better floating-point performance: 366.3 gflops vs 73.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 20 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 623 vs 208
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 212 vs 84
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 March 2014 vs 9 June 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 575 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 15.26 GTexel / s vs 9.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 192 vs 32 |
| Floating-point performance | 366.3 gflops vs 73.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 20 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 vs 208 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 vs 84 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
- 1400x more memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1857 vs 1833
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1857 vs 1833
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1857 vs 1833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1857 vs 1833 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 | 208 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 | 84 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1946 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 100.391 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 | 1857 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 | 1857 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | GK208B | G84 |
| Launch date | 27 March 2014 | 9 June 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $34.99 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1488 | 1486 |
| Price now | $34.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 23.15 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 575 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Floating-point performance | 366.3 gflops | 73.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
| Pipelines | 192 | 32 |
| Texture fill rate | 15.26 GTexel / s | 9.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 20 Watt |
| Transistor count | 292 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | MXM-HE |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | 1400 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3, GDDR2 |
| Shared memory | no | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| PhysX | ||
| PureVideo | ||
| Gigathread technology | ||
| HDCP-capable | ||
| PCI-E 16x | ||
| PowerMizer 7.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 320M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9300 GS
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7470 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7420G
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
AMDFirePro M2000
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
AppleA12Z Bionic
