NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M vs AMD Radeon HD 6490M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M and AMD Radeon HD 6490M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 94% higher texture fill rate: 12.4 GTexel / s vs 6.4 GTexel / s
- Around 16% better floating-point performance: 297.6 gflops vs 256 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 444 vs 378
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2843 vs 1405
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2843 vs 1405
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 2543
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 2543
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 9 January 2013 vs 4 January 2011 |
| Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s vs 6.4 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops vs 256 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 444 vs 378 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2843 vs 1405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2843 vs 1405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 vs 2543 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 vs 2543 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6490M
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 775 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 160 vs 96
- Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 4.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 514 vs 118
- Around 97% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4866 vs 2465
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 775 MHz |
| Pipelines | 160 vs 96 |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 514 vs 118 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4866 vs 2465 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6490M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M | AMD Radeon HD 6490M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 444 | 378 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 118 | 514 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2465 | 4866 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1019 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1019 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2843 | 1405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2843 | 1405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 2543 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 2543 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.554 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 96.344 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.001 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.814 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M | AMD Radeon HD 6490M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GF117 | Seymour |
| Launch date | 9 January 2013 | 4 January 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1185 | 1188 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,193.03 | |
| Price now | $1,193.03 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 0.39 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 256 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 160 |
| Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s | 6.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 370 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 / GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6490M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7660D
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710M vs
IntelIris Graphics 5100
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M265X
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 920A
