NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M vs ATI Radeon HD 2350 PRO
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M and ATI Radeon HD 2350 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 48% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 525 MHz
- 5.9x more texture fill rate: 12.4 GTexel / s vs 2.1 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 96 vs 40
- 7.1x better floating-point performance: 297.6 gflops vs 42 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 20 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 5.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 440 vs 77
- 24.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 136
- 24.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 136
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 January 2013 vs 1 January 2007 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 525 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s vs 2.1 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 96 vs 40 |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops vs 42 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 20 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 440 vs 77 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 vs 136 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 vs 136 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2350 PRO
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 262 vs 120
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 262 vs 120 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2350 PRO
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M | ATI Radeon HD 2350 PRO |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 440 | 77 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 120 | 262 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2422 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1019 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1019 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2843 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2843 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 136 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 136 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M | ATI Radeon HD 2350 PRO | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GF117 | RV610 |
Launch date | 9 January 2013 | 1 January 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1190 | 1193 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 525 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 42 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s | 2.1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 180 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR2 |