AMD Radeon R9 M265X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M265X and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M265X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2x more texture fill rate: 25 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
- 6.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 96
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 800.0 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1140 vs 444
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 207 vs 118
- 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8856 vs 2465
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1972 vs 1019
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1972 vs 1019
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 March 2014 vs 9 January 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 25 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops vs 297.6 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1140 vs 444 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 207 vs 118 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8856 vs 2465 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1972 vs 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1972 vs 1019 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1125 MHz
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2843 vs 1765
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 3214
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2843 vs 1765
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 3214
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1125 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2843 vs 1765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 vs 3214 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2843 vs 1765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 vs 3214 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M265X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M265X | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1140 | 444 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 207 | 118 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8856 | 2465 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.633 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 525.038 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.169 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.076 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.404 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1972 | 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1765 | 2843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1972 | 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1765 | 2843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 3329 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M265X | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Venus | GF117 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch date | 21 March 2014 | 9 January 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1183 | 1185 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 625 MHz | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 775 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | 297.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 25 GTexel / s | 12.4 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 585 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |