NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M

NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M

Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
Around 17% better floating-point performance: 297.6 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2422 vs 2387
Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1019 vs 967
Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1019 vs 967
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2843 vs 2766
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2843 vs 2766

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	9 January 2013 vs 22 March 2012
Floating-point performance	297.6 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 33 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	2422 vs 2387
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1019 vs 967
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1019 vs 967
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2843 vs 2766
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2843 vs 2766

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 532 vs 438
Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 152 vs 119
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3329
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3329

Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	532 vs 438
PassMark - G2D Mark	152 vs 119
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 3329

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

438

532

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

119

152

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

2422

2387

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1019

967

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1019

967

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2843

2766

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2843

2766

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3329

3359

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3329

3359

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M	NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
PassMark - G3D Mark	438	532
PassMark - G2D Mark	119	152
Geekbench - OpenCL	2422	2387
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1019	967
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1019	967
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2843	2766
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2843	2766
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3329	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3329	3359
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		5.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		215.004
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.635
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		10.393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		19.903
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M	NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Fermi
Code name	GF117	GF108
Launch date	9 January 2013	22 March 2012
Place in performance rating	1172	1390
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Core clock speed	775 MHz
Floating-point performance	297.6 gflops	253.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	96	96
Texture fill rate	12.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	33 Watt
Transistor count	585 million	585 million
CUDA cores		96
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Bus support		PCI Express 2.0
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
DirectX 11.2		12 API
OpenCL		1.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	DDR3\GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11		DirectX 11
Optimus