NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 59% higher texture fill rate: 12.4 GTexel / s vs 7.8 billion / sec
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 35 Watt
  • 2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2612 vs 2012
  • Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.901 vs 4.25
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1047 vs 929
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2570 vs 1210
  • Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2035 vs 1524
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1047 vs 929
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2570 vs 1210
  • Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2035 vs 1524
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 April 2013 vs 15 January 2011
Texture fill rate 12.4 GTexel / s vs 7.8 billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 33 Watt vs 35 Watt
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 2612 vs 2012
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 6.901 vs 4.25
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1047 vs 929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2570 vs 1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2035 vs 1524
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1047 vs 929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2570 vs 1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2035 vs 1524

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

  • Around 68% higher core clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 775 MHz
  • Around 4% better floating-point performance: 249.6 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
  • Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 536 vs 450
  • Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 176 vs 119
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1300 MHz vs 775 MHz
Floating-point performance 249.6 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 536 vs 450
PassMark - G2D Mark 176 vs 119

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
450
536
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
119
176
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2612
2012
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6.901
4.25
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1047
929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2570
1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2035
1524
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1047
929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2570
1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2035
1524
Name NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
PassMark - G3D Mark 450 536
PassMark - G2D Mark 119 176
Geekbench - OpenCL 2612 2012
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 6.901 4.25
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 146.913
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.587
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 10.121
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 22.755
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1047 929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2570 1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2035 1524
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1047 929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2570 1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2035 1524

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

Essentials

Architecture Fermi 2.0 Fermi
Code name GF117 GF106
Launch date 1 April 2013 15 January 2011
Place in performance rating 1438 1441
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 938 MHz
Core clock speed 775 MHz 1300 MHz
Floating-point performance 240.0 gflops 249.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 96 96
Texture fill rate 12.4 GTexel / s 7.8 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 33 Watt 35 Watt
Transistor count 585 million 1,170 million
CUDA cores 96

Video outputs and ports

7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 2560x1600
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 2560x1600
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 2.0
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized large

API support

DirectX 12 API 12 API with Feature Level 12.1
OpenCL 1.1 1.1
OpenGL 4.5 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 12.8 GB / s 25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz 800 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3
Shared memory 0 0
Standard memory configuration DDR3

Technologies

Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
3D Vision
DirectCompute
DirectX 11 DirectX 11