NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M vs NVIDIA NVS 5400M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M and NVIDIA NVS 5400M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 660 MHz
- Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 12.4 GTexel / s vs 10.56 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2612 vs 2127
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.901 vs 5.068
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.755 vs 19.696
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2570 vs 1652
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2570 vs 1652
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 April 2013 vs 1 June 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 660 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s vs 10.56 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2612 vs 2127 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.901 vs 5.068 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.755 vs 19.696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2570 vs 1652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2570 vs 1652 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5400M
- Around 6% better floating-point performance: 253.4 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 620 vs 450
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 186 vs 119
- Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 229.562 vs 146.913
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.635 vs 0.587
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.384 vs 10.121
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1069 vs 1047
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2282 vs 2035
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1069 vs 1047
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2282 vs 2035
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Floating-point performance | 253.4 gflops vs 240.0 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 620 vs 450 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 186 vs 119 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 229.562 vs 146.913 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 vs 0.587 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.384 vs 10.121 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1069 vs 1047 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2282 vs 2035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1069 vs 1047 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2282 vs 2035 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 5400M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M | NVIDIA NVS 5400M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 450 | 620 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 119 | 186 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2612 | 2127 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.901 | 5.068 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 146.913 | 229.562 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.587 | 0.635 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.121 | 11.384 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.755 | 19.696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1047 | 1069 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2570 | 1652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2035 | 2282 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1047 | 1069 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2570 | 1652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2035 | 2282 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M | NVIDIA NVS 5400M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | GF117 | GF108 |
| Launch date | 1 April 2013 | 1 June 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1438 | 1439 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 938 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 660 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 240.0 gflops | 253.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 96 |
| Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s | 10.56 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 2560x1600 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 2560x1600 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM |
| Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
