NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M vs NVIDIA Quadro 600

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M and NVIDIA Quadro 600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
• Around 80% better floating-point performance: 441.6 gflops vs 245.76 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 21% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 40 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 636 vs 535
• Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3550 vs 2056
• Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.572 vs 5.617
• Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.808 vs 0.444
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.943 vs 8.848
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 39.301 vs 16.137
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1524 vs 899
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1426 vs 1255
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2519 vs 2037
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1524 vs 899
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1426 vs 1255
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2519 vs 2037

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 600

• Around 11% higher core clock speed: 640 MHz vs 575 MHz
• Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 10.24 GTexel / s vs 9.2 GTexel / s
• Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 230 vs 128
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 185.752 vs 151.304

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	636 535
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	128 230
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3550 2056
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.572 5.617
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	151.304 185.752
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.808 0.444
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.943 8.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	39.301 16.137
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1524 899
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1426 1255
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2519 2037
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1524 899
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1426 1255
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2519 2037

Compare specifications (specs)