Intel HD Graphics 5300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 5300 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5300
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 900 MHz vs 889 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 181 vs 129
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 1 April 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 900 MHz vs 889 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 181 vs 129 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
- 5.8x more core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 100 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 648 vs 400
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3749 vs 1468
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1524 vs 709
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1524 vs 709
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1426 vs 693
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1426 vs 693
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2519 vs 1627
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2519 vs 1627
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz vs 100 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 648 vs 400 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3749 vs 1468 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1524 vs 709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1524 vs 709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1426 vs 693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1426 vs 693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2519 vs 1627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2519 vs 1627 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 5300
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 5300 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 400 | 648 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 181 | 129 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1468 | 3749 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 709 | 1524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 709 | 1524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 693 | 1426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 693 | 1426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1627 | 2519 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1627 | 2519 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.572 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 151.304 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.808 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.943 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 39.301 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 5300 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | Broadwell GT2 | GK208 |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 1 April 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1458 | 1460 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | 889 MHz |
Core clock speed | 100 MHz | 575 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 33 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,300 million | |
Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 9.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |