Intel HD Graphics 5300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 5300 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5300

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 900 MHz vs 889 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
  • Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 181 vs 129
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 September 2014 vs 1 April 2013
Boost clock speed 900 MHz vs 889 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 181 vs 129

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M

  • 5.8x more core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 100 MHz
  • 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
  • Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 650 vs 401
  • 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3687 vs 1476
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1524 vs 709
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1524 vs 709
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1426 vs 693
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1426 vs 693
  • Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2519 vs 1627
  • Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2519 vs 1627
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 575 MHz vs 100 MHz
Pipelines 384 vs 24
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 650 vs 401
Geekbench - OpenCL 3687 vs 1476
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1524 vs 709
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1524 vs 709
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1426 vs 693
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1426 vs 693
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2519 vs 1627
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2519 vs 1627

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 5300
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
401
650
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
181
129
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
1476
3687
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
709
1524
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
709
1524
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
693
1426
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
693
1426
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1627
2519
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1627
2519
Name Intel HD Graphics 5300 NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
PassMark - G3D Mark 401 650
PassMark - G2D Mark 181 129
Geekbench - OpenCL 1476 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 709 1524
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 709 1524
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 693 1426
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 693 1426
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1627 2519
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1627 2519
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 8.572
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 151.304
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.808
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 13.943
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 39.301

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics 5300 NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M

Essentials

Architecture Generation 8.0 Kepler 2.0
Code name Broadwell GT2 GK208
Launch date 5 September 2014 1 April 2013
Place in performance rating 1457 1459
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 900 MHz 889 MHz
Core clock speed 100 MHz 575 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 24 384
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 33 Watt
Transistor count 1,300 million
Floating-point performance 441.6 gflops
Texture fill rate 9.2 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus support PCI Express 3.0

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12 API
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 64 Bit
Shared memory 1 0
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3
Standard memory configuration DDR3

Technologies

Quick Sync
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus