NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M vs NVIDIA Quadro 410

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M and NVIDIA Quadro 410 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
• Around 63% better floating-point performance: 441.6 gflops vs 271.1 gflops
• Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 38 Watt
• 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
• Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz
• Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 636 vs 438
• 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3550 vs 1446
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.572 vs 5.393
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 151.304 vs 126.006
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.943 vs 5.685
• 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 39.301 vs 8.847
• Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1524 vs 919
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1426 vs 1311
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2519 vs 1794
• Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1524 vs 919
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1426 vs 1311
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2519 vs 1794

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 410

• Around 23% higher core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 575 MHz
• Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 11.3 GTexel / s vs 9.2 GTexel / s
• Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 220 vs 128

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 410

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	636 438
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	128 220
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3550 1446
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.572 5.393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	151.304 126.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.943 5.685
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	39.301 8.847
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1524 919
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1426 1311
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2519 1794
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1524 919
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1426 1311
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2519 1794

Compare specifications (specs)