NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M and NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1249 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 96 vs 64
- Around 25% better floating-point performance: 240 gflops vs 192 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 389 vs 357
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 85 vs 72
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3123 vs 3076
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3123 vs 3076
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 vs 21 August 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1249 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Pipelines | 96 vs 64 |
Floating-point performance | 240 gflops vs 192 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 389 vs 357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 85 vs 72 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3123 vs 3076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3123 vs 3076 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
- Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 19.2 GTexel / s vs 16 GTexel / s
Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s vs 16 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 389 | 357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 85 | 72 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3123 | 3076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3123 | 3076 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8210 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT215 | G94 |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 | 21 August 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1373 | 1376 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1249 MHz | 600 MHz |
CUDA cores | 96 | 64 |
Floating-point performance | 240 gflops | 192 gflops |
Gigaflops | 360 | 240 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 64 |
Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s | 19.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 727 million | 505 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DisplayPortLVDSHDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGA | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | large |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
SLI | ||
PureVideo HD |