NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1249 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 16 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
- 2x better floating-point performance: 240 gflops vs 120 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 389 vs 381
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3123 vs 1962
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3123 vs 1962
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 vs 10 March 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1249 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 96 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 240 gflops vs 120 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 389 vs 381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3123 vs 1962 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3123 vs 1962 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 109 vs 85
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 109 vs 85 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 389 | 381 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 85 | 109 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3123 | 1962 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3123 | 1962 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8210 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT215 | G94B |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 | 10 March 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1373 | 1375 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1249 MHz | 500 MHz |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 240 gflops | 120 gflops |
Gigaflops | 360 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s | 12 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 727 million | 505 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DisplayPortLVDSHDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGA | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Length | 229 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 24 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
SLI |