NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M and NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1436 MHz vs 625 MHz
- Around 76% higher texture fill rate: 17.6 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 96 vs 32
- 2.8x better floating-point performance: 275.71 gflops vs 99.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 38 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 654 vs 209
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 1901
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 1901
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 vs 29 July 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1436 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 96 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 275.71 gflops vs 99.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 38 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 654 vs 209 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 vs 1901 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 vs 1901 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 120 vs 58
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 120 vs 58 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M | NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 654 | 209 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 58 | 120 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11217 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 1901 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 1901 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M | NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT215 | G96 |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 | 29 July 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1375 | 1377 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1436 MHz | 625 MHz |
CUDA cores | 96 | 32 |
Floating-point performance | 275.71 gflops | 99.2 gflops |
Gigaflops | 413 | 148 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s | 10 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 38 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 727 million | 314 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Single Link DVILVDSHDMIDual Link DVIDisplayPortVGA | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-II | MXM-II |
Laptop size | large | medium sized |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
SLI | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |