NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 and NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 3.9x more core clock speed: 1566 MHz vs 400 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
Launch date | 13 September 2010 vs 3 June 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1566 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel
- 8.8x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 106 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt vs 106 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1322 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 310 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4907 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.758 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 302.509 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.965 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.925 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.656 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2160 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3365 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2160 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3365 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Tesla |
Code name | GF106 | MCP79 |
Launch date | 13 September 2010 | 3 June 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $129 | |
Place in performance rating | 1130 | not rated |
Price now | $64.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 26.46 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1566 MHz | 400 MHz |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Floating-point performance | 601.3 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 100 °C | |
Pipelines | 192 | |
Texture fill rate | 25.1 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 106 Watt | 12 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 57.7 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI |