AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 5.6x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 106 Watt
| Launch date | 21 December 2013 vs 13 September 2010 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 106 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1566 MHz vs 625 MHz
- 5x more texture fill rate: 25.1 billion / sec vs 5 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 192 vs 160
- 3x better floating-point performance: 601.3 gflops vs 200.0 gflops
- Around 35% higher memory clock speed: 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz vs 1334 MHz
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3365 vs 1681
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3365 vs 1681
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 vs 3290
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 vs 3290
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1566 MHz vs 625 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 25.1 billion / sec vs 5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 192 vs 160 |
| Floating-point performance | 601.3 gflops vs 200.0 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz vs 1334 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3365 vs 1681 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3365 vs 1681 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 vs 3290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 vs 3290 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1681 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1681 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3290 | 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3290 | 3325 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1322 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 310 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4907 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.758 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 302.509 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.965 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.925 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.656 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2160 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2160 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
| Code name | Caicos | GF106 |
| Launch date | 21 December 2013 | 13 September 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 1127 | 1130 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $129 | |
| Price now | $64.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 26.46 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 1566 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 200.0 gflops | 601.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 160 | 192 |
| Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 25.1 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 106 Watt |
| Transistor count | 370 million | 1,170 million |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 100 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 10.67 GB / s | 57.7 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1334 MHz | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM with others
AMDRadeon R5 230 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450
AMDRadeon R5 230 OEM vs
AMDRadeon E6760
AMDRadeon R5 230 OEM vs
AMDRadeon HD 7750
AMDRadeon R5 230 OEM vs
IntelHD Graphics 6000
AMDRadeon R5 230 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R5 310 OEM
AMDRadeon R5 230 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R7 M465
