AMD Radeon HD 7750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 25.6 GTexel / s vs 25.1 billion / sec
- 2.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 192
- Around 36% better floating-point performance: 819.2 gflops vs 601.3 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 41% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 106 Watt
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1701 vs 1322
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 426 vs 304
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.658 vs 14.758
- Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 566.052 vs 302.509
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.182 vs 0.965
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.143 vs 14.925
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 98.126 vs 27.656
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 February 2012 vs 13 September 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s vs 25.1 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 512 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops vs 601.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 106 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1701 vs 1322 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 426 vs 304 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.658 vs 14.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 566.052 vs 302.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.182 vs 0.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.143 vs 14.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.126 vs 27.656 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz vs 1125 MHz
- 7.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2160 vs 305
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3365 vs 1439
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 vs 3295
- 7.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2160 vs 305
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3365 vs 1439
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 vs 3295
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz vs 1125 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2160 vs 305 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3365 vs 1439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 vs 3295 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2160 vs 305 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3365 vs 1439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 vs 3295 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 7750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1701 | 1322 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 426 | 304 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.658 | 14.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 566.052 | 302.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.182 | 0.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.143 | 14.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.126 | 27.656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 305 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1439 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3295 | 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 305 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1439 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3295 | 3325 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4926 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 7750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Cape Verde | GF106 |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Launch date | 15 February 2012 | 13 September 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | $129 |
Place in performance rating | 1142 | 1144 |
Price now | $149.99 | $64.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.41 | 26.46 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops | 601.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 192 |
Stream Processors | 512 | |
Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s | 25.1 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 106 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,170 million |
Core clock speed | 1566 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 100 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 57.7 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI |