AMD Radeon HD 7750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 25.6 GTexel / s vs 25.1 billion / sec
- 2.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 192
- Around 36% better floating-point performance: 819.2 gflops vs 601.3 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 41% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 106 Watt
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1700 vs 1323
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 425 vs 304
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.658 vs 14.758
- Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 566.052 vs 302.509
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.182 vs 0.965
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.143 vs 14.925
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 98.126 vs 27.656
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 February 2012 vs 13 September 2010 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s vs 25.1 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops vs 601.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 106 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1700 vs 1323 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 425 vs 304 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.658 vs 14.758 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 566.052 vs 302.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.182 vs 0.965 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.143 vs 14.925 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.126 vs 27.656 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz vs 1125 MHz
- 7.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2160 vs 305
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3365 vs 1439
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 vs 3295
- 7.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2160 vs 305
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3365 vs 1439
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 vs 3295
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz vs 1125 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2160 vs 305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3365 vs 1439 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 vs 3295 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2160 vs 305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3365 vs 1439 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 vs 3295 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 7750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1700 | 1323 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 425 | 304 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.658 | 14.758 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 566.052 | 302.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.182 | 0.965 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.143 | 14.925 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.126 | 27.656 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 305 | 2160 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1439 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3295 | 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 305 | 2160 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1439 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3295 | 3325 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5036 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 7750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Cape Verde | GF106 |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Launch date | 15 February 2012 | 13 September 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | $129 |
| Place in performance rating | 1142 | 1144 |
| Price now | $149.99 | $64.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.41 | 26.46 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops | 601.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 192 |
| Stream Processors | 512 | |
| Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s | 25.1 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 106 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,170 million |
| Core clock speed | 1566 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 100 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 57.7 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon HD 7750 with others
AMDRadeon HD 7750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8800M GTX
AMDRadeon HD 7750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450
AMDRadeon HD 7750 vs
NVIDIATesla M2090
AMDRadeon HD 7750 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M265DX
AMDRadeon HD 7750 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M365X
AMDRadeon HD 7750 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M315
