NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 and NVIDIA Tesla C1060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1566 MHz vs 610 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 77% lower typical power consumption: 106 Watt vs 188 Watt
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz vs 1600 MHz
| Launch date | 13 September 2010 vs 9 April 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 1566 MHz vs 610 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 106 Watt vs 188 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C1060
- Around 94% higher texture fill rate: 48.8 GTexel / s vs 25.1 billion / sec
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 240 vs 192
- Around 3% better floating-point performance: 622.1 gflops vs 601.3 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18689 vs 4907
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 48.8 GTexel / s vs 25.1 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 240 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops vs 601.3 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18689 vs 4907 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C1060
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | NVIDIA Tesla C1060 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1322 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 310 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4907 | 18689 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.758 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 302.509 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.965 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.925 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.656 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2160 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3365 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2160 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3365 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | NVIDIA Tesla C1060 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GF106 | GT200B |
| Launch date | 13 September 2010 | 9 April 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $129 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1130 | 1131 |
| Price now | $64.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 26.46 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1566 MHz | 610 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Floating-point performance | 601.3 gflops | 622.1 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 100 °C | |
| Pipelines | 192 | 240 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.1 billion / sec | 48.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 106 Watt | 188 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 1,400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI | No outputs |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | 267 mm |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.7 GB / s | 102.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||

