NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 7000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro 7000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 53% higher core clock speed: 999 MHz vs 651 MHz
- Around 28% higher texture fill rate: 53.12 GTexel / s vs 41.66 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
- Around 28% better floating-point performance: 1,700 gflops vs 1,332 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 204 Watt
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 3404 MHz
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4056 vs 3505
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 January 2018 vs 2 May 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 999 MHz vs 651 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 53.12 GTexel / s vs 41.66 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,700 gflops vs 1,332 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 204 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 3404 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4056 vs 3505 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 7000
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 397 vs 289
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 1491
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1341
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 1491
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1341
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 397 vs 289 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 vs 1491 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 1341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 vs 1491 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 1341 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 7000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4056 | 3505 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 289 | 397 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12690 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6614 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1491 | 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1341 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6614 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1491 | 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1341 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2076 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 32.699 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1142.156 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.796 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.693 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 110.277 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro 7000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | GP107 | GF110 |
| Launch date | 3 January 2018 | 2 May 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 695 | 698 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $14,499 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1328 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 999 MHz | 651 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,700 gflops | 1,332 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 512 |
| Texture fill rate | 53.12 GTexel / s | 41.66 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 204 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 3,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | 177.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 3404 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs
ATIRadeon X700
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6150
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6100 + nForce 430
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro 7000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile
