NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro K5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • Around 42% higher core clock speed: 999 MHz vs 706 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 122 Watt
  • Around 30% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5400 MHz
  • Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4056 vs 3987
  • Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12690 vs 11376
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6614 vs 6288
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6614 vs 6288
  • Around 54% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2076 vs 1351
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 3 January 2018 vs 17 August 2012
Core clock speed 999 MHz vs 706 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 122 Watt
Memory clock speed 7008 MHz vs 5400 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 4056 vs 3987
Geekbench - OpenCL 12690 vs 11376
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6614 vs 6288
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6614 vs 6288
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2076 vs 1351

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5000

  • Around 70% higher texture fill rate: 90.37 GTexel / s vs 53.12 GTexel / s
  • 2.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 640
  • Around 28% better floating-point performance: 2,169 gflops vs 1,700 gflops
  • Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 430 vs 289
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3680 vs 1491
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 1341
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3680 vs 1491
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 1341
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 90.37 GTexel / s vs 53.12 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1536 vs 640
Floating-point performance 2,169 gflops vs 1,700 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 430 vs 289
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3680 vs 1491
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3352 vs 1341
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3680 vs 1491
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3352 vs 1341

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5000

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
4056
3987
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
289
430
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
12690
11376
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6614
6288
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1491
3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1341
3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6614
6288
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1491
3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1341
3352
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
2076
1351
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro K5000
PassMark - G3D Mark 4056 3987
PassMark - G2D Mark 289 430
Geekbench - OpenCL 12690 11376
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6614 6288
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1491 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1341 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6614 6288
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1491 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1341 3352
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2076 1351
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 31.318
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 681.141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.062
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 32.922
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 67.311

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro K5000

Essentials

Architecture Pascal Kepler
Code name GP107 GK104
Launch date 3 January 2018 17 August 2012
Place in performance rating 695 697
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $2,499
Price now $1,950
Value for money (0-100) 2.47

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1328 MHz
Core clock speed 999 MHz 706 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,700 gflops 2,169 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 640 1536
Texture fill rate 53.12 GTexel / s 90.37 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 122 Watt
Transistor count 3,300 million 3,540 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size large
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 112.1 GB / s 172.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 7008 MHz 5400 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0