NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) and AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 225 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6321 vs 4619
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 648 vs 590
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 55.446
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 vs 4.68
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 294.215
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 6821
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 6821
• Around 41% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2336 vs 1651

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition

• Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 80 GTexel / s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 768
• Around 20% better floating-point performance: 2,560 gflops vs 2,138 gflops
• 171.4x more memory clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 7 GB/s
• 3.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 77430 vs 20725
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 952.668 vs 843.503
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.456 vs 24.676
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3687
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3336
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3687
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3336

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6321 4619
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	648 590
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	20725 77430
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.758 55.446
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	843.503 952.668
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.071 4.68
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.676 64.456
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	301.168 294.215
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 6821
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 6821
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2336 1651

Compare specifications (specs)