AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Around 82% higher texture fill rate: 121.6 GTexel / s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 1792 vs 768
- Around 82% better floating-point performance: 3,892 gflops vs 2,138 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 714.3x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 7 GB/s
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 772 vs 648
- Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 25596 vs 20720
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 87.861 vs 75.758
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1362.14 vs 843.503
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.025 vs 5.071
- 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 106.141 vs 24.676
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 121.6 GTexel / s vs 66.82 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 3,892 gflops vs 2,138 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 7 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 772 vs 648 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 25596 vs 20720 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.861 vs 75.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1362.14 vs 843.503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.025 vs 5.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 106.141 vs 24.676 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 95% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 713 MHz
- Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1086 MHz
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6317 vs 5552
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 250.267
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 5579
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 1691
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 1565
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 5579
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 1691
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 1565
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 713 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 1086 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6317 vs 5552 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 vs 250.267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 vs 5579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 vs 1691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 vs 1565 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 vs 5579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 vs 1691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 vs 1565 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5552 | 6317 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 772 | 648 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 25596 | 20720 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.861 | 75.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1362.14 | 843.503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.025 | 5.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 106.141 | 24.676 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 250.267 | 301.168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5579 | 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1691 | 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1565 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5579 | 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1691 | 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1565 | 3336 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2337 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Ellesmere | GP107 |
Launch date | 18 November 2016 | 25 October 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $139 |
Place in performance rating | 482 | 483 |
Price now | $349.99 | $159.99 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.34 | 46.07 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1086 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Core clock speed | 713 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,892 gflops | 2,138 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 121.6 GTexel / s | 66.82 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 3,300 million |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 145 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 112 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 7 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |