NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 75 Watt
785.7x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 7 GB/s
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3687
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3687
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3336
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3336

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	11 January 2017 vs 25 October 2016
Pipelines	1024 vs 768
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt vs 75 Watt
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz vs 7 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 vs 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 vs 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3336

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1025 MHz
Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 66.82 GTexel / s vs 65.6 GTexel / s
Around 2% better floating-point performance: 2,138 gflops vs 2,099 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 648 vs 379
Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6321 vs 4242
Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20725 vs 16429
Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 6337
Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 6337

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1392 MHz vs 1025 MHz
Texture fill rate	66.82 GTexel / s vs 65.6 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	2,138 gflops vs 2,099 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	648 vs 379
PassMark - G3D Mark	6321 vs 4242
Geekbench - OpenCL	20725 vs 16429
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8496 vs 6337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8496 vs 6337

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

379

648

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

4242

6321

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

16429

20725

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6337

8496

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6337

8496

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3687

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3687

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3336

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3336

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark	379	648
PassMark - G3D Mark	4242	6321
Geekbench - OpenCL	16429	20725
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6337	8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6337	8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	3687
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	3336
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	3336
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		301.168
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		2336

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Pascal
Code name	GM206	GP107
Launch date	11 January 2017	25 October 2016
Place in performance rating	478	476
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$139
Price now		$159.99
Value for money (0-100)		46.07
Technical info
Core clock speed	1025 MHz	1392 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,099 gflops	2,138 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Pipelines	1024	768
Texture fill rate	65.6 GTexel / s	66.82 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	2,940 million	3,300 million
Boost clock speed		1392 MHz
CUDA cores		768
Maximum GPU temperature		97 °C
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
G-SYNC support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length		145 mm
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	88 GB / s	112 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	7 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
VR Ready